<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crossposted update warning worth reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/</link>
	<description>Dog parks, dog products, dog services, dog events...EVERYTHING DOG in San Diego</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: petdefense</title>
		<link>http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[petdefense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/#comment-110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a comment, this was a comment but not by an attorney; rather, this is by a person that has actually written legislation and raised/shown/bred/studied dogs. This was before 1634 was amended. The current state of 1634 on 8/21/08 is kept current on Pet Connection, but PETPAC got word Levine was trying to slip a fast one and change the bill&#039;s number to another number. Whether that took place I dont know. Petpac website (http://www.petpac.net) usually updates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a comment, this was a comment but not by an attorney; rather, this is by a person that has actually written legislation and raised/shown/bred/studied dogs. This was before 1634 was amended. The current state of 1634 on 8/21/08 is kept current on Pet Connection, but PETPAC got word Levine was trying to slip a fast one and change the bill&#8217;s number to another number. Whether that took place I dont know. Petpac website (<a href="http://www.petpac.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.petpac.net</a>) usually updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msperfection</title>
		<link>http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[msperfection]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandiegodog.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/crossposted-update-warning-worth-reading/#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that if AB1634 passes, it will lead to the destruction of the purebred dog.  It will impact the quality of all breeds across the board.  The people behind this omnious bill have an agenda and they are determined to see it through.  This negatively impact all aspects of the pet industry.

Dog lovers lack of action on this will be their undoing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that if AB1634 passes, it will lead to the destruction of the purebred dog.  It will impact the quality of all breeds across the board.  The people behind this omnious bill have an agenda and they are determined to see it through.  This negatively impact all aspects of the pet industry.</p>
<p>Dog lovers lack of action on this will be their undoing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
