Another crosspost, Battles Everywhere! War!War!War!

Thursday, April 17, 2008 at 7:16 am 2 comments

Permission given to cross post.
This article is written by Joyce Miller of Dallas, Texas.
Be sure to read the last line a second time.
Right now, animal rights people have fanned out across the country to
make what got tabled in California happen city by city, town by town,
state by state. The approach is to local animal services
organization; the agenda is new animal laws that will have a
startling effect on our ability to enjoy our dogs.
The AR volunteers work within the animal services in city after city,
town after town, to get a proposed law put together that is extreme
to say the least, and they can do all of this within animal services
without worrying about open meeting laws. After all, the AR people
are simply volunteers helping the staff. By the time a community gets
any inkling that these laws are about to hit the stage, it’s just
about too late to stop them.
At the most, people try to get some of the most severe terms relaxed.
Right now, there is a law proposed in Florida to make collecting
animal semen illegal.
Now that I have your attention, let me share with you what is
currently being recommended in Dallas, what Animal Services and the
City Council are assuming will be law by the end of the month, and to
date, nothing in the local newspapers, the local news programs, or
even a copy of the actual proposed law.
Unlike San Antonio, the previous last city to fall to these tactics,
the AKC kennel club registered in Dallas, the Texas Kennel Club, has
hired an animal lawyer to help them fight this legislation. But to
date, without any news coverage, very few residents know what is
about to happen and how it will affect their enjoyment of their dogs.
1. Pet limits. Dallas has never had limits on the number of pets a
resident may own. As with most communities, there are plenty of laws
on the books that can handle households that have too many pets that
are creating a neighborhood nuisance or constituting cruelty to
animals. Under the proposed new laws, the limit will be either five
or six pets (no one seems able to get a consistent reading on the
number). That is dogs, cats or combination in a single family home.
2. Mandatory spay neuter by four months of age. Owner of unspayed or
unneutered dogs and cats over 4 months of age commits an offense if
the owner does not have a Breeder Permit issued annually for each
individual animal. (Only dog and cat show breeders qualify for this
permit). Owner cannot have a say in their dog being put under
anesthesia, being made a perennial puppy by losing the hormones
needed for balanced growth of body and mind, etc.
3. Breeder permits/licenses (and the only article that has mentioned
anything about this law was a quote by the acting director of animal
services, a man who has won an award of some kind of merit from PeTA:
in that article, this man stated that he would not allow any breeder
permits in residential neighborhoods) . So what will a breeder
license look like in Dallas if the law is passed without changes. It
appears that there will be:
A. Breeder permit/license to keep an intact dog or cat. Breeders can
apply to Animal Services for a breeder permit/license. Such
applications must be approved by the director of Animal Services.
B. Each dog or cat approved for a permit must be registered with a
national registry (approved by the animal services director) AND
whose owner is a member of a purebred dog or cat club (also approved
by the animal services director). The club must have a code of ethics
restricting breeding dogs and cats with genetic defects and life
threatening health problems for approval.
C.The breeder permit will be $500 annually for EACH intact animal;
the animal’s license will be an additional fee.
D. This permit will not be available to any other pet owner. And as
mentioned above, it is unlikely that the current Animal Services
administration will allow any of these permits/licenses in
residential neighborhoods. This means that sports people, performance
people, SAR people, hunting people will have to have their animals
E. Anyone who gets a breeder permit agrees that Animal Services has
the right to send in someone to make unannounced inspections of their
premises at any time and the breeders must admit them.
F.. No one else can legally breed animals in Dallas.
4. No tethering of any dogs if the owner is not present.
5. Confined dogs must have crates or runs or pens that meet
confinement requirements of 150 feet pen size per dog
6. Foster Care Providers must obtain a form from the director to
apply for a permit (notarized by the legal owner and one occupant of
the dwelling unit) to keep up to 10 dogs, cats or any combination
which authorizes unannounced inspections of premises and this permit
must be approved by the director.
When I first read these proposed ideas, I thought that they were
making them so outrageous so they would have wiggle room in order to
reduce things like the permit fee for breeders etc. But given the
fact that hearings are going into their second week (only on
Wednesdays), there has been no media coverage, and proponents are
saying that they expect these to be law by the end of the month, I
suspect that the final law could be quite close to what is outlined
The first that I heard about it was in March, and I heard about it
from two people who are very involved with the kennel club and with
getting people to attend hearings. No cost assessments/ analyses have
been done. Animal Services is currently underfunded, and the mayor
has made it clear that there will be no increase in their funding for
these laws.
So, here we are discussing different ways of training, recognizing
the work that goes into having an obedience or agility champion,
knowing what the dogs need maturity to participate in any serious
sport or work, and all the while, across the country, more and more
of these laws are becoming law with little or no fanfare.
Here in Dallas, the proponents are saying that this will solve the
problem of loose dogs breeding randomly, but the only people that
will be caught up are the residential breeders whose dogs never run
loose and never breed randomly. With the requirement that a breeder
belong to a breed club approved by animal services, this is also
meant to do away with mixed breeds.
Do, please, check out what may be happening in your city or town, and
be ready to fight for your right to decide when and if your dog will
be neutered, the right of careful breeders to breed to their breed
standards, etc. Dallas breeders and animal lovers are making a
valiant effort, and they are grateful for the help of the Texas
Kennel Club, but this is very, very serious. And it sounds like it
will come to a city or town near you.
Joyce Miller of Dallas, Texas
“You should not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will
convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would
do and the harm it would cause if improperly administered.” Lyndon
Johnson, 36th President of the U.S.

Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

Another Important Viewpoint for Dog/Animal Enthusiasts This Means War by Cindy Cooke

2 Comments Add your own

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Add to Technorati Favorites

Add to Technorati Favorites

Event Calendar

April 2008
« Mar   May »

Recent Posts

Flickr Photos

%d bloggers like this: